Rotor size & weight
Matched to the user, from about ½ lb for a child to 1 lb for a bodybuilder.
The Evolution of the Revolution
Spinweight is a hand-powered, gear-driven gyroscope. Turn it, and gyroscopic precession pushes back perpendicular to your effort. The faster you go, the harder it pushes: double the speed, four times the resistance.
*Up to 18 kcal/min in one self-administered VO₂ test by the founder (N=1). See Evidence.
Why Spinweight exists
At 19, I had a severe traumatic brain injury from a motorcycle crash. It left me with aphasia and amnesia. I struggled to connect thoughts to words, to remember, and to regulate myself.
Years later I started training with handheld gyroscopes, and I noticed something no other workout gave me: managing a fast, constantly shifting force seemed to switch things back on.
N=1 This is my personal story, one person, not a clinical trial. It's why I built Spinweight, and it's the idea I want tested properly in controlled research.
How it works
You move the handles in circles, and the gears multiply that motion into high rotor speed (up to about 10,000 RPM). A fast-spinning rotor resists being turned. Every time you redirect it, it pushes back at a right angle to the force you apply. That push is gyroscopic precession.
The torque is always perpendicular to your effort and changes direction as your hands move. So the resistance never comes from one fixed line the way a dumbbell or cable does. Your hands, arms, and trunk have to work together continuously in three dimensions to control it.
The gearing ties rotor speed to how fast you cycle the handles (ωspin = ratio × ωprecession). That's why resistance rises with the square of speed. Go slow and it's gentle. Speed up and it gets intense, up to VO₂-max effort using only your hands.
How this is calculated: the curve fits Spinweight's own force table (≈26 N at 5,000 RPM, ≈58 N at 7,500, ≈105 N at 10,000 RPM; dots on the chart). It follows F ≈ k·RPM², with k ≈ 1.05×10⁻⁶ N/RPM². “Multiple of rotor weight” divides handle force by the weight of the rotor (about 0.75 lb in that table). It is not a G-load on your body. Hand cycling speed = rotor RPM ÷ drive ratio. Results are modeled values for one rotor configuration. They aren't dynamometer measurements, and the chart doesn't extrapolate past 10,000 RPM.
Matched to the user, from about ½ lb for a child to 1 lb for a bodybuilder.
Grip diameter and shape suited to the hand using it.
Sets how much of the workload comes as fast coordination versus raw mechanical force.
Change any of these and you change how the work is split between coordination demand and muscular load. It's less like picking a dumbbell weight and more like choosing your paints before you start: the same canvas, a different brushstroke for your neuromuscular development.
The multi-speed transmission lets you tune how many coordination cycles you perform for each calorie burned.
Evidence
I keep these three categories separate so you can judge each claim on its own footing.
A spinning rotor resists being redirected with a torque perpendicular to the applied force (τ = I·ωs·ωp). With geared coupling, resistance scales with the square of speed. This is textbook mechanics.
The nervous system learns to compensate for gyroscopic torque, and arm configuration is central to how that learning is organized.
Flanders M, Hondzinski JM, Soechting JF, Jackson JC. Using arm configuration to learn the effects of gyroscopes and other devices. J Neurophysiol. 2003;89:450–459. doi:10.1152/jn.00053.2002
In older adults, coordination training increased hippocampal volume. Balance training improved memory and spatial cognition without changing cardio fitness. Balance and functional exercise reduced the rate of falls.
Niemann C, Godde B, Voelcker-Rehage C. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014. · Rogge AK et al. Sci Rep. 2017. · Sherrington C et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019.
In a self-administered, video-documented VO₂ test, I burned up to 18 calories per minute using only my hands. One person, one test: an early data point, not a clinical study. Independent replication is the next step. Watch it.
After a severe TBI, years of gyroscopic training went along with my recovery of speech and memory and with new skills (tightrope walking, juggling while standing on a ball). That's a personal account, not proof of cause.
Does high-frequency coordination demand add metabolic and cognitive load beyond the mechanical work performed? Does Spinweight training improve balance, cognition, or brain-injury recovery more than conventional exercise? These questions need controlled studies.
Precession doesn't depend on gravity, so the same resistance should work in microgravity too. That hasn't been tested in spaceflight yet.
Who it's for
A dosable, speed-controlled coordination load for studying cognitive-motor exercise, sensorimotor control, and metabolic cost. The open questions above are a ready-made study list.
Discuss a study →A handheld, self-powered tool. Resistance starts gentle and rises only as fast as the user drives it, so it can be graded to the person in front of you.
Talk about a pilot →Combine it with treadmills, bikes, or balance work, so athletes have to hold coordination under a shifting load and under fatigue.
Book a demo →A workout where coordination is the cardio. Slow and easy for beginners, sprint-level when you speed up. No heavy weights.
Ask about availability →Specs
Prototype specifications. They may change before production.
Video library
A self-administered, video-documented VO₂ test: up to 18 calories per minute using only my hands. One person, one test. It's an early data point, not a clinical study, and independent replication is the next step.
Open on Google Drive ↗Contact
Researchers, clinicians, coaches, and press are welcome. Tell me a little about what you're working on.
Chris Oremus, Founder